Tulin kattoo ku lizard squad hackerman vääntää koodii mut tääl joku nevari vaa strugglaa aws secretien kanssa… smh…
mooi tota vittu oisko poistaa jotai akuuttii lua scriptii tai jotai fivem skriptii ku jonnet syyhki koodit vittu laita vaik piuhal tai jotai. philisp mankka kajari akuutti 15min github säätö tos ni saan siit jotain ni voin sit maksaa, en laita tilil mitää kuumottaa vitusti modet yms bannien takia ni koodaile jotai jos mitää fivem servuu tms ois poistaa palaillaa sit mo -Varahahmo
In XGH you don’t think, you do the first thing that comes to your mind. There’s not a second option as the first one is faster.
The right way, the wrong way and the XGH way; which is exactly like the wrong one but faster. XGH is faster than any development process you know (see Axiom 14).
For every bug solved using XGH, seven more are created. As all of them will be solved using XGH, then it's utility tends to the infinite.
Errors only come to exist when someone notices them.
It solves the problem? It compiled? You commit it and don’t think about it anymore.
If things go wrong your part will always be correct… and your colleagues will be the ones dealing with the problems.
Schedules given to you by your clients are all but important. You will ALWAYS be able to implement EVERYTHING in time (even if that means accessing the database through some crazy script).
For people using XGH someday the ship goes down, as time passes by and the system grows into a bigger monster. When that day comes, you'd better have your resume ready or have someone else to blame.
Write code as you see fit. If it solves the problem, commit and forget about it.
If things ever go wrong just use XGH to quickly solve the problem. Whenever the problem requires rewriting the whole software it’s time for you to drop off before the whole thing goes down.
There’s no need for a project manager. There’s no owner and everyone does whatever they want when the problems and requirements appear.
Putting TODO comments in the code as a promise that the code will be improved later helps the XGH developer. He/She won’t feel guilt for the shit he/she did. Surely there won’t be any refactoring (see Axiom 10).
Delivery dates and costs are absolute things. Quality is relative. Never think about quality but instead think about the minimum time required to implement a solution. Actually… don’t think! Do! (see Axiom 1)
Scrum, XP? Those are just trends. XGH developers don’t follow temporary trends. XGH always was, and always will be used by those who despise quality.
Many WOP require smart thinking. XGH requires no thinking (see Axiom 1).
If your colleagues use XGH and you are the only uptight coward who wants to do things the right way then quit it! For any design pattern that you apply correctly your colleagues will generate 10 times more rotten code using XGH.
This axiom is very complex but it says that a XGH project is always in chaos. Don’t try to put order into XGH (see Axiom 16) as it’s useless. You’ll spend a lot of precious time and it will make things go down even faster.
Don’t try to manage XGH, because it’s auto-sufficient (see Axiom 11), like chaos.
While you want it XGH will always be at your side. But be careful not to abandon him. If you start something using XGH and then turn to some trendy methodology you will be fucked up. XGH doesn’t allow refactoring (see Axiom 10) and your new uptight system will collapse. When that happens only XGH can save you.
Never ever change — or even think of question — a working code. That’s a complete waste of time. Even more as refactoring doesn’t exist (see Axiom 10).
Time is the engine behind XGH and quality is just a meaningless detail.
If you ever work with XGH you'd better know what you’re doing. And if you know what you’re doing, then why test? Tests are a waste of time. If it compiles, it’s good.
Failure and success are really similar and XGH is not different. People normally think that a project can have greater chances of failing when using XGH. But success is just a way of seeing it.
The project failed. You learned something with it? Then for you it was a success!
Never touch a class of code which you’re not the author. When a team member dies, or stays away for too long, it will eventually go down. When that happens use Axiom 8.